Terms and Conditions .2
#15 ~ the action of inaction
What One says, what One doesn’t say -
what One does, and what One doesn’t do
The thing about agreements is, that we are making them all the time whether we know it or not. The significance of this little act, agreeing, is that when you are being played and don’t know it, the outcome of your agreement by action or inaction may take you places you had no intention, or awareness, of going. It is only with due diligence and with clear unbiased analysis that One can figure out how One got to where they now are. Or, how a civilized society, somewhat at least, has come too: tent cities of homeless in most every major centre, a wave of drug abuse and overdose that seems to be tsunami in magnitude, and the murder of a living concept called the middle class. If you have come to a place in time, where you are not happy, if you do nothing, you are in complete agreement with all the things that brought you to this unhappy experience.
In Natural Law, the element of deceit is accepted on its face. If a leopard lays in wait to ambush the gazelle, hiding in the bushes, we expect it and think nothing other than “I hope it is a quick death with as little suffering as necessary”. And to that, the leopard does its job to take it down and kill it with as much efficiency as possible. Direct African sun and the speed and agility of a gazelle is not to be under-appreciated. However, I think that nature’s efficiency would dictate that there is not an attachment or understanding that it, nature, is inherently good or evil. Jordan Peterson has oft’ talked about the severe threat that nature brings to everything and everyone, a fact that many are reluctant to face the reality of. Where Cynthia and I live, and as I write this in early January in northern Alberta, the bitter cold that lies outside my insulated walls and crackling fireside, has no ill will towards me or my livestock. To my livestock eating just to stay warm, let alone grow new babies inside of them, this cold, is the present enemy.
So it is easy for One to see the disparity of condition in nature and, for the most part, continue on with acceptance and understanding that this is just the way that it is, a painful truth. So is it nature and natural law that rules man? Is this what has brought about such destruction and pain in this world at this moment? Is it natural to buy and sell children and use them for some deranged pursuit of pleasure or sacrifice to One’s god? This is not nature or natural. It is not but for the necessity of life of the leopard and her cubs, that the gazelle comes closer to death with each swat of a claw or puncturing tooth. The utter non-necessity of the deranged and demented abuser committing atrocities against all of mankind is not nature or natural, but it is the opposite of life and living, of what it is to live. It is evil. Backwards and the inverse of life, love, and to be a - live. This evil, bringing about, in the end, nothing other than destruction and death.
If One is able to consider, that like in nature, in our existence there is real suffering and pain. It sits alongside beauty and harmony. Just like the blood of the gazelle that spatters the beautiful flowers as the soft wind blows bringing the change in season; the torment of evil, actualized and manifested, is ever-present in our pleasant and charming pursuit of the distraction and comfort we call a life. I do not judge the leopard. I do judge the merchants of people, the sellers of innocence, and I choose to accept that they actually exist, and my willingness to experience the agony of that truth; instead of hiding my eyes and consciousness to stanch the wound of this brutal reality. I also judge those who refuse to accept that evil, that expresses through men and women, and to boot, is ever present and that it is our duty and call from The Creator to stand in its way, to call it out/turn the other cheek (in the true meaning of turning of the cheek) and shine the light of love and truth into the dark recesses that it, evil, lies in wait.
~ on Cheeks and Accountability
I have reviewed my previous posts several times. I am certain that I discussed the true meaning of “turning the other cheek”. At the risk of repeating myself, I offer the following: KJV Mathew 5 verse 38 - 40;
38 Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
39 But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
40 And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also.
My interpretation of this passage is not to be commonly found. When an adversary, comes upon you and finds you in contempt; such that he finds it appropriate to act in such a way as to strike you upon the cheek, a slap in the face; the issue and question is, why? Why does another find you in contempt, assessing you as the wrongful party, the One who has caused harm? Now, if it be true, that you have caused harm and are in contempt, then you not only deserve the strike upon your face, but also deserve the second strike, on the other cheek. Be thou guilty and thou deservest the punishment given. Now herein lies the question, and I believe the essence of Jesus’ command. Is this passage simply to reinforce the punishment of the guilty? I do not believe this to be the “truth” in this passage. I also do not believe that this message from the redeemer is a directive of passivity or meekness to the innocent. For if thou enemy, without just cause strike you upon the cheek, offer him the other, to concretize his, the enemies, position. If it is the case that the offender, the striker, is in deed the one to be found in contempt and without cause, then allow him to declare in open court, the public square, that he is in breach of truth and justice. As the receiver of such unjust punishment, we are acting as the conduit of the energetic expression of truth. The manifestor, the object, that is used to bring consciousness to the unconscious.
And so, I feel, it is our duty and call, to stand against such wrong and travesty: human trafficking and the selling of innocence to the service of depravity, deviance and corruption. To allow oneself to be exposed to the hypocrisy of those who wish to “turn a blind eye” and slap your cheek for telling the truth and exposing the painful and uncomfortable truth that there are those little ones, in our immediate community, that are suffering and are being mistreated. I think at this point, it is not a question of whether or not there are terrible things happening to innocents, but just to whom will accept this truth and pain, and then further, are willing to make sacrifice in an attempt to bring a stop to it.
This of course is not limited to the travesty of child trafficking and sexual deviance and murder; this is the whole caboodle! The entirety of wrongdoing and transgressions upon man and God! We have the ability to make a choice. That is the nature of this experience. For man, the nature and natural is; what choice will One make? Which wolf will you feed? The good, or evil?
from the Voice of the Editor,
Cynthia, has brought a simple and clear example of this “stand … and calling out”. In 2020, Netflix brought forward the movie “Cuties”, in which an obvious “sexualization of minors” was, if not taking place in the movie, was portrayed in the hype and advertising for same. Many Netflix subscribers canceled their subscriptions and payments to Netflix upon this realization. It is what ended our final tether to the mainstream, Netflix Online, and we too, cancelled our subscription and support for such detritis. It is an action such as this, seemingly insignificant in the big picture, that I call for in the rejection of acquiescent agreement.
Acquiescence:
To acquiesce - accept something reluctantly but without protest
ence (or ance) - word-forming element attached to verbs to form abstract nouns of process or fact
What is done when the dog bites and there is no refusal or objection? If the dog/puppy bites and One does not resist and rebut; then One is reinforcing the position that the dog is Alpha, and is the boss, and can bite whenever it may feel compelled to do so. Not a very healthy relationship that any pet owner might have with their little furry friend. I have detailed this at length in my previous post, “When the Dog Bites”.
We acquiesce all the time. A “news” byte on the TV, a scene in a movie, even a commercial bringing you the latest and greatest! If One does not actively and consciously dis-agree with what is being presented, if appropriate to do so, in the etherial conscious and sub-conscious it is viewed as agreement. The “action of in-action” the sub heading to this post. One may think that this is only relevant within One’s own experience and consciousness. The acquiescence to evil is agreement that this is ok with “this” such and One; — is it?
Agreement:
harmony or accordance in opinion or feeling; a position or result of agreeing
a negotiated and typically legally binding arrangement between parties as to a course of action
Agreement to a course of action means allowing it to happen or giving it your approval
What are the things that One agrees to that One has within its power to change? I look up at the chemtrails nearly every day and I don’t agree with that action. I choose to not do anything about it, other than to consciously hold that this is wrong and I do not agree. In my life, I create things by my own action which are incorrect. Sometimes I am able to recognize those incorrect elements and do something to correct them. One incorrect agreement that I have chosen to correct, as much as is within my reach, is the assumption by any that I act as or for NAME, the one that sounds like my name. God made me a living breathing man with a soul. The Hennepin County Registrar created something they were hoping I would attach myself to, ARLEN PAUL (insert family NAME here). And for most of my life, I did just that.
Attachment:
the state of being personally attached
From Black’s Law - “… used either for the purpose of bringing a person before the court, of acquiring jurisdiction over the property seized …”
psychology - a strong emotional bond that an infant forms with a caregiver (such as a mother) especially when viewed as a basis for normal emotional and social development
I think the first definition above is the one that makes a difference in most of what I have been presenting. Interestingly enough, coming from “Collins Dictionary”, wherein it further clarifies the standing of what One is attaching Oneself to, the person. One attaches oneself to NAME by all of the means of lawful formations of contract and agreement: by speaking, saying that is my name or that is me; by signing as or for on all manner of legal and pedestrian documents; and finally, most importantly, binding, and subtle, by performance, by acting as, answering to, or presenting Oneself as. One does not have to say or sign that they are the Driver, who’s NAME appears on a license, if One presents said license to the officer upon request, attaching oneself to the whole entirety of Statute Code and liability that comes with that station.
Adhere and Adhesion:
to stick or be attached firmly to, cleave to, or joining
If you adhere to a rule or agreement, you act in the way that it says you should.
If you adhere to an opinion or belief, you support or hold it.
Adhesion - A type of contract, a legally binding agreement between two parties to do a certain thing, in which one side has all the bargaining power and uses it to write the contract primarily to his or her advantage.
Are some of the dots connecting?
The Adhesion contract that goes along with all things “Citizen”, puts One in the position of agreement to adhere to all Statue Code pertaining to same. This is where the Courts seem to be fully corrupt and not in adherence to Constitutions, Human Rights Codes, et al. However, it is often the case that the seeming “corruption” is just the obeyance of CORPORATE Statute Code. Wherein, it holds One in junior Corporate status. As the sub Corp. Registered to and linking up the chain to CROWN/City of London, with it, oddly enough, as the Head of all things CORPORATE, Registered ones at least.
In listening to several podcasts over the last couple of days, I hear many coming to a question of how to escape the obvious corruption and evil, that those at the top, running the show here right now, operate with and under the authority of. It appears to me, that the system cannot be reformed, renovated, improved, or cleaned up. If the same Registry regimen exists, One binds Oneself to that Head/CROWN and makes it impossible to NOT have respect or preference for persons/corporations. This subjugation of self removes the authority, given to you by your God and Creator of true unlimited rights and freedoms, not those specified by constitutions and declarations.
Have it good,
Arlen Paul