Lurking, is no longer an option!

# 1 ~ Or ... My not so smoothly choreographed dance out of Babylon

---

Photo Credit : Cynthia

---

Perhaps “lurking” is a bit of an overstatement. I have been in court many times, in two different countries (countries not counties), dealing with issues that I have been directly involved and named in, “placed” in the back of police cruisers with extra pieces of temporary jewelry three times, and spent only 1 hour behind an involuntarily locked door that had bars. Maybe I’m just not very good at lurking? Hey! Lurk over here, Lurk at me! ;-)

So why this commentary on legal and or lawful activities?

Because I’m a MAN baby! No, this is not a claim or boast of strength, toughness, bravado, or machismo. It is purely and simply what I am. I cannot BE anything else (and to be crystal, although I am male, that is not the distinction I am making by saying “man”, I am speaking as to specie or type, as in “canine, feline, bovine, Ovis aries, etc., vis a vis, “man”). I can act as, act for, or be surety for any number of other things that are not “a man”. I can act as an Executor of an estate, or as a registered partner of a corporation, or even the owner and holder of an LLC. But no matter how hard you try to fit me onto the piece of paper, filed away in a filing cabinet somewhere, Registered in the Province of Alberta, I cannot BE a corporation.

So what does this have to do with anything?:

It actually has to do with everything that is in our world right now. All relationships that cover: family, business, purchasing, dying, selling, driving, insuring, borrowing, voting, suing, marriage, education, ownership, flying, sailing, religions, etc. I think you get the idea, pretty much everything but giving your dog a pat on the head (as long as your dog has its license of course ;-).

Cynthia and I recently bought and installed our first wood burning appliance. We have been living in the forest of Northern alberta for 20 years now and have harvested many dozen cords of firewood that was burned and enjoyed in other people’s homes. With the research into our specific unit and how best to use it, we came upon “The Bald Explorer”, Richard Vobes while looking on YouTube last fall (2022). That was our introduction to Richard, giving us a report on how he used his stove and how he liked it. Several years prior, sometime in the mid ‘teens I believe, I followed on YouTube RDS where he introduced me to Martin Geddes, a British ex-computer-network systems expert. It was in reading a recent Martin Geddes post that he referenced Richard Vobes recent interview with William Keyte,

an aficionado of things Constitutional and Political. You may be figuring out where this is headed about now.

So in listening to The Bald Explorer, “I think it’s time to do this”,

where he speaks as to who is “in charge”, I felt compelled to send along a note to Richard. As I had been conversing with Martin Geddes the previous afternoon about things very similar I cc’d him as well. It appears immediately below:

email sent to Richard Vobes Feb 9, 2023

Who is in Charge???

Richard, firstly, thank you for your "stepping up" to speak and use your platform to illuminate and explore the dark recesses!

I believe my subject line says it all.  In your recent video, you put forward the statement, “It’s us of course”.  I made it through almost all of the video when I felt compelled to arise from my tub (I was in the bath, watching the video on my iPad) to respond to you directly.

I have spent the last 14 years of my life attempting to make sense of the underlying strata that directs the mystery of the goings on of our world.  Finance, commerce, government, and now healthcare.  They all lead unfortunately, to the same place.

I have listened intently to the two interviews that you just did with William Keyte.  I agree with much of what he brought forward, including the most important element, that the Right of each man and woman is, or at least should be, known in the heart of each such an one, and does not need to be prescribed in a document that is called a “Constitution”, “Bill Of Rights”, “Human Rights Code”, or any other such limiting document that is prepared by men, not our creator.

The dilemma which your, “It’s us of course!”, video brings to light is contract.  What Contract!! You may ask????

Some background:  

Firstly; please allow me to describe the ones that are behind and directing this action as “They”.  Whomever “They” may be is not relevant yet.

Secondly; if you haven’t noticed, which I believe you have, They must make all of their offers to us known/public.  Through direct offers, the news, future forecasts/studies or even Hollywood movies.  The offer is presented and if we do not disagree, then it is assumed that we agree (this is an expression of Natural Law (we are educated to believe the opposite, that we must take the action of agreeing to be binding to an offer, this is not the case, in-action and silence is also complete agreement)).

So now to the meat of the matter.

I saw you move your arms in the video, YOU did that, under your own control.  If you agree within a contract, that every movement of your arms must conform to a prescribed limit, then someone else would have CHARGE of your arms. The CONTRACT would have CHARGE of your arms.  Now I refer back to the subject line of this email: CHARGE: the responsibility of taking care or control of someone or something (in this example, your arms).

As William Keyte brought forward, the will of the people, or group/soceity, forms/creates the authority of the administrators/government.  That is absolutely correct and truth!

As is exemplified in any protest or overthrow of the government or ruling class.  A la the French Revolution or the drawing up of the Magna Carta itself.

However:

Within our freedom and Right as men and women, “The People”, we have the ability and Right to contract.  That sounds great!!  The only trouble with that is, when someone, “THEY”, come along who are better at drawing up agreements, and in fact may even know human; behaviour, psychology, and Natural (God’s) Law better than we the uneducated masses, each such an One can take their “Right to contract” and get themselves into trouble!

I posit the following:

They offered a contract(s).

Our parents accepted the offer, through; ignorance, action and inaction.  We, each such an One, accepted the offer/contract; through ignorance, action, and inaction.

So now we find ourselves asking why all these things are happening to us and around us, and perhaps most painfully, to the ones that we love.  It is our agreements that have brought us to this point.  I do not wish to point fingers and blame as to why slothful, devious, envious, greedy, … people have brought us to this point in time, it matters not. What does matter, is what each such an One takes upon themselves to make right.  To correct the tacit agreements, the lies and deceit that by not taking the action of DIS-agreement when presented with the offer (in all manner of forms) it is assumed that we are okay with being raped, stolen from, lied to, cheated, murdered, … and perhaps as you have put forward in your video, taken CHARGE of.

We have all agreed to it.  I am not talking about a conceptual CHARGE, or agreement.  I am talking about documents, signatures, contractual papers with the ability to sue and be sued.

When Keytes references Dean Clifford and Robert Menard in Canada, I am quite familiar with both of them, there are absolutely elements that they got wrong.  And I am not contending that I have it all right!  William Keyte does not, within your interviews, nor the concept of “rule by the authority of the people”, overcome the contracts and agreements that we, every single such an One, are bound to, legally, and enforceable in a court as we have already performed in agreement.

Within the Contract:

Through either: RE-contracting, or Rescission, one is able to alter or quash, ab initio, a contract.  That is to say, that we can take it back to the beginning, and extinguish the need to “move ones arms within the limits of the agreement” ;-)

Unfortunately, it is my opinion and experience, that the whole strata, even the foundations of law and government have been interwoven with this simple deceit and trickery that until each such an One stands to say NO!, which is a version of what Keyte is suggesting, although to free oneself from the bindings of voluntary slavery and legal “personhood” must first be accomplished, even if only in spirit and consciousness!  It is from this UNDER-standing that one can say to all, that I… WE… are in charge!!

Cheers,

Arlen

It was upon Martin’s urging that this post, and indeed my new Substack exists. I will endeavour to continue to share what brought me to the consciousness that I now possess and some more specifics on how one might dance out of Babylon.

No permit required to BE a dog

Have it good,

Arlen